Teknologi Informasi    
   
Daftar Isi
(Sebelumnya) Cloud collaborationCloud.bg (Berikutnya)

Cloud computing

Cloud computing logical diagram

Cloud computing is the use of computing resources (hardware and software) that are delivered as a service over a network (typically the Internet). The name comes from the use of a cloud-shaped symbol as an abstraction for the complex infrastructure it contains in system diagrams. Cloud computing entrusts remote services with a user's data, software and computation.

In the business model using software as a service, users are provided access to application software and databases. Cloud providers manage the infrastructure and platforms that run the applications. SaaS is sometimes referred to as “on-demand software” and is usually priced on a pay-per-use basis. SaaS providers generally price applications using a subscription fee.

Proponents claim that the SaaS allows a business the potential to reduce IT operational costs by outsourcing hardware and software maintenance and support to the cloud provider. This enables the business to reallocate IT operations costs away from hardware/software spending and personnel expenses, towards meeting other IT goals. In addition, with applications hosted centrally, updates can be released without the need for users to install new software. One drawback of SaaS is that the users' data are stored on the cloud provider’s server. As a result, there could be unauthorized access to the data.

End users access cloud-based applications through a web browser or a light-weight desktop or mobile app while the business software and user's data are stored on servers at a remote location. Proponents claim that cloud computing allows enterprises to get their applications up and running faster, with improved manageability and less maintenance, and enables IT to more rapidly adjust resources to meet fluctuating and unpredictable business demand.[1][2]

Cloud computing relies on sharing of resources to achieve coherence and economies of scale similar to a utility (like the electricity grid) over a network.[3] At the foundation of cloud computing is the broader concept of converged infrastructure and shared services.

Contents

History

The origin of the term cloud computing is obscure, but it appears to derive from the practice of using drawings of stylized clouds to denote networks in diagrams of computing and communications systems. The word cloud is used as a metaphor for the Internet, based on the standardized use of a cloud-like shape to denote a network on telephony schematics and later to depict the Internet in computer network diagrams as an abstraction of the underlying infrastructure it represents. The cloud symbol was used to represent the Internet as early as 1994.[4][5]

The underlying concept of cloud computing dates back to the 1950s, when large-scale mainframe became available in academia and corporations, accessible via thin clients / terminal computers, often referred to as "dumb terminals", because they were used for communications but had no internal computational capacities. To make more efficient use of costly mainframes, a practice evolved that allowed multiple users to share both the physical access to the computer from multiple terminals as well as to share the CPU time. This eliminated periods of inactivity on the mainframe and allowed for a greater return on the investment. The practice of sharing CPU time on a mainframe became known in the industry as time-sharing.[6]

In the 1990s, telecommunications companies, who previously offered primarily dedicated point-to-point data circuits, began offering virtual private network (VPN) services with comparable quality of service, but at a lower cost. By switching traffic as they saw fit to balance server use, they could use overall network bandwidth more effectively. They began to use the cloud symbol to denote the demarcation point between what the provider was responsible for and what users were responsible for. Cloud computing extends this boundary to cover servers as well as the network infrastructure.[7]

As computers became more prevalent, scientists and technologists explored ways to make large-scale computing power available to more users through time sharing, experimenting with algorithms to provide the optimal use of the infrastructure, platform and applications with prioritized access to the CPU and efficiency for the end users.[8]

John McCarthy opined in the 1960s that "computation may someday be organized as a public utility." [6] Almost all the modern-day characteristics of cloud computing (elastic provision, provided as a utility, online, illusion of infinite supply), the comparison to the electricity industry and the use of public, private, government, and community forms, were thoroughly explored in Douglas Parkhill's 1966 book, The Challenge of the Computer Utility. Other scholars have shown that cloud computing's roots go all the way back to the 1950s when scientist Herb Grosch (the author of Grosch's law) postulated that the entire world would operate on dumb terminals powered by about 15 large data centers.[9] Due to the expense of these powerful computers, many corporations and other entities could avail themselves of computing capability through time sharing and several organizations, such as GE's GEISCO, IBM subsidiary The Service Bureau Corporation (SBC, founded in 1957), Tymshare (founded in 1966), National CSS (founded in 1967 and bought by Dun & Bradstreet in 1979), Dial Data (bought by Tymshare in 1968), and Bolt, Beranek and Newman (BBN) marketed time sharing as a commercial venture.

The development of the Internet from being document centric via semantic data towards more and more services was described as "Dynamic Web".[10] This contribution focused in particular in the need for better meta-data able to describe not only implementation details but also conceptual details of model-based applications.

The ubiquitous availability of high-capacity networks, low-cost computers and storage devices as well as the widespread adoption of hardware virtualization, service-oriented architecture, autonomic, and utility computing have led to a tremendous growth in cloud computing.[11][12][13]

After the dot-com bubble, Amazon played a key role in the development of cloud computing by modernizing their data centers, which, like most computer networks, were using as little as 10% of their capacity at any one time, just to leave room for occasional spikes. Having found that the new cloud architecture resulted in significant internal efficiency improvements whereby small, fast-moving "two-pizza teams" (teams small enough to feed with two pizzas) could add new features faster and more easily, Amazon initiated a new product development effort to provide cloud computing to external customers, and launched Amazon Web Service (AWS) on a utility computing basis in 2006.[14][15]

In early 2008, Eucalyptus became the first open-source, AWS API-compatible platform for deploying private clouds. In early 2008, OpenNebula, enhanced in the RESERVOIR European Commission-funded project, became the first open-source software for deploying private and hybrid clouds, and for the federation of clouds.[16] In the same year, efforts were focused on providing quality of service guarantees (as required by real-time interactive applications) to cloud-based infrastructures, in the framework of the IRMOS European Commission-funded project, resulting to a real-time cloud environment.[17] By mid-2008, Gartner saw an opportunity for cloud computing "to shape the relationship among consumers of IT services, those who use IT services and those who sell them"[18] and observed that "organizations are switching from company-owned hardware and software assets to per-use service-based models" so that the "projected shift to computing... will result in dramatic growth in IT products in some areas and significant reductions in other areas."[19]

On March 1, 2011, IBM announced the Smarter Computing framework to support Smarter Planet.[20] Among the various components of the Smarter Computing foundation, cloud computing is a critical piece.

Similar systems and concepts

Cloud computing shares characteristics with:

  • Autonomic computing — Computer systems capable of self-management.[21]
  • Client–server modelClient–server computing refers broadly to any distributed application that distinguishes between service providers (servers) and service requesters (clients).[22]
  • Grid computing — "A form of distributed and parallel computing, whereby a 'super and virtual computer' is composed of a cluster of networked, loosely coupled computers acting in concert to perform very large tasks."
  • Mainframe computer — Powerful computers used mainly by large organizations for critical applications, typically bulk data processing such as census, industry and consumer statistics, police and secret intelligence services, enterprise resource planning, and financial transaction processing.[23]
  • Utility computing — The "packaging of computing resources, such as computation and storage, as a metered service similar to a traditional public utility, such as electricity."[24][25]
  • Peer-to-peer means distributed architecture without the need for central coordination. Participants are both suppliers and consumers of resources (in contrast to the traditional client–server model).
  • Cloud gaming—also known as on-demand gaming—is a way of delivering games to computers. Gaming data is stored in the provider's server, so that gaming is independent of client computers used to play the game.

Characteristics

Cloud computing exhibits the following key characteristics:

  • Agility improves with users' ability to re-provision technological infrastructure resources.
  • Application programming interface (API) accessibility to software that enables machines to interact with cloud software in the same way that a traditional user interface (e.g., a computer desktop) facilitates interaction between humans and computers. Cloud computing systems typically use Representational State Transfer (REST)-based APIs.
  • Cost is claimed to be reduced, and in a public cloud delivery model capital expenditure is converted to operational expenditure.[26] This is purported to lower barriers to entry, as infrastructure is typically provided by a third-party and does not need to be purchased for one-time or infrequent intensive computing tasks. Pricing on a utility computing basis is fine-grained with usage-based options and fewer IT skills are required for implementation (in-house).[27] The e-FISCAL project's state of the art repository[28] contains several articles looking into cost aspects in more detail, most of them concluding that costs savings depend on the type of activities supported and the type of infrastructure available in-house.
  • Device and location independence[29] enable users to access systems using a web browser regardless of their location or what device they are using (e.g., PC, mobile phone). As infrastructure is off-site (typically provided by a third-party) and accessed via the Internet, users can connect from anywhere.[27]
  • Virtualization technology allows servers and storage devices to be shared and utilization be increased. Applications can be easily migrated from one physical server to another.
  • Multitenancy enables sharing of resources and costs across a large pool of users thus allowing for:
    • Centralization of infrastructure in locations with lower costs (such as real estate, electricity, etc.)
    • Peak-load capacity increases (users need not engineer for highest possible load-levels)
    • Utilisation and efficiency improvements for systems that are often only 10–20% utilised.[14]
  • Reliability is improved if multiple redundant sites are used, which makes well-designed cloud computing suitable for business continuity and disaster recovery.[30]
  • Scalability and elasticity via dynamic ("on-demand") provisioning of resources on a fine-grained, self-service basis near real-time,[31] without users having to engineer for peak loads.[32][33]
  • Performance is monitored, and consistent and loosely coupled architectures are constructed using web services as the system interface.[27]
  • Security could improve due to centralization of data, increased security-focused resources, etc., but concerns can persist about loss of control over certain sensitive data, and the lack of security for stored kernels.[34] Security is often as good as or better than other traditional systems, in part because providers are able to devote resources to solving security issues that many customers cannot afford.[35] However, the complexity of security is greatly increased when data is distributed over a wider area or greater number of devices and in multi-tenant systems that are being shared by unrelated users. In addition, user access to security audit logs may be difficult or impossible. Private cloud installations are in part motivated by users' desire to retain control over the infrastructure and avoid losing control of information security.
  • Maintenance of cloud computing applications is easier, because they do not need to be installed on each user's computer and can be accessed from different places.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology's definition of cloud computing identifies "five essential characteristics":

On-demand self-service. A consumer can unilaterally provision computing capabilities, such as server time and network storage, as needed automatically without requiring human interaction with each service provider.

Broad network access. Capabilities are available over the network and accessed through standard mechanisms that promote use by heterogeneous thin or thick client platforms (e.g., mobile phones, tablets, laptops, and workstations).

Resource pooling. The provider’s computing resources are pooled to serve multiple consumers using a multi-tenant model, with different physical and virtual resources dynamically assigned and reassigned according to consumer demand. ...

Rapid elasticity. Capabilities can be elastically provisioned and released, in some cases automatically, to scale rapidly outward and inward commensurate with demand. To the consumer, the capabilities available for provisioning often appear unlimited and can be appropriated in any quantity at any time.

Measured service. Cloud systems automatically control and optimize resource use by leveraging a metering capability at some level of abstraction appropriate to the type of service (e.g., storage, processing, bandwidth, and active user accounts). Resource usage can be monitored, controlled, and reported, providing transparency for both the provider and consumer of the utilized service.
—National Institute of Standards and Technology[3]

On-demand self-service

On-demand self-service allows users to obtain, configure and deploy cloud services themselves using cloud service catalogues, without requiring the assistance of IT.[36][37] This feature is listed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) as a characteristic of cloud computing.[3]

The self-service requirement of cloud computing prompts infrastructure vendors to create cloud computing templates, which are obtained from cloud service catalogues. Manufacturers of such templates or blueprints include BMC Software (BMC), with Service Blueprints as part of their cloud management platform[38] Hewlett-Packard (HP), which names its templates as HP Cloud Maps[39] RightScale[40] and Red Hat, which names its templates CloudForms.[41]

The templates contain predefined configurations used by consumers to set up cloud services. The templates or blueprints provide the technical information necessary to build ready-to-use clouds.[40] Each template includes specific configuration details for different cloud infrastructures, with information about servers for specific tasks such as hosting applications, databases, websites and so on.[40] The templates also include predefined Web service, the operating system, the database, security configurations and load balancing.[41]

Cloud consumers use cloud templates to move applications between clouds through a self-service portal. The predefined blueprints define all that an application requires to run in different environments. For example, a template could define how the same application could be deployed in cloud platforms based on Amazon Web Service, VMware or Red Hat.[42] The user organization benefits from cloud templates because the technical aspects of cloud configurations reside in the templates, letting users to deploy cloud services with a push of a button.[43][44] Cloud templates can also be used by developers to create a catalog of cloud services.[45]

Service models

Cloud computing providers offer their services according to several fundamental models:[3][46] infrastructure as a service (IaaS), platform as a service (PaaS), and software as a service (SaaS) where IaaS is the most basic and each higher model abstracts from the details of the lower models. In 2012, network as a service (NaaS) and communication as a service (CaaS) were officially included by ITU (International Telecommunication Union) as part of the basic cloud computing models, recognized service categories of a telecommunication-centric cloud ecosystem.[47]

Cloud computing layers.png

Infrastructure as a service (IaaS)

In the most basic cloud-service model, providers of IaaS offer computers - physical or (more often) virtual machines - and other resources. (A hypervisor, such as Xen or KVM, runs the virtual machines as guests. Pools of hypervisors within the cloud operational support-system can support large numbers of virtual machines and the ability to scale services up and down according to customers' varying requirements.) IaaS clouds often offer additional resources such as images in a virtual-machine image-library, raw (block) and file-based storage, firewalls, load balancers, IP addresses, virtual local area networks (VLANs), and software bundles.[48] IaaS-cloud providers supply these resources on-demand from their large pools installed in data centers. For wide-area connectivity, customers can use either the Internet or carrier clouds (dedicated virtual private networks).

To deploy their applications, cloud users install operating-system images and their application software on the cloud infrastructure. In this model, the cloud user patches and maintains the operating systems and the application software. Cloud providers typically bill IaaS services on a utility computing basis[citation needed]: cost reflects the amount of resources allocated and consumed.

Examples of IaaS providers include Amazon CloudFormation, Amazon EC2, Windows Azure Virtual Machines, DynDNS, Google Compute Engine, HP Cloud, iland, Joyent, Oracle Infrastructure as a Service, SingleHop, Rackspace Cloud, ReadySpace Cloud Services, SAVVIS, Terremark, NaviSite, and Linode.

Platform as a service (PaaS)

In the PaaS model, cloud providers deliver a computing platform typically including operating system, programming language execution environment, database, and web server. Application developers can develop and run their software solutions on a cloud platform without the cost and complexity of buying and managing the underlying hardware and software layers. With some PaaS offers, the underlying computer and storage resources scale automatically to match application demand such that cloud user does not have to allocate resources manually.

Examples of PaaS include: AWS Elastic Beanstalk, Cloud Foundry, Heroku, Force.com, EngineYard, Mendix, OpenShift, Google App Engine, Windows Azure Cloud Services and OrangeScape.

Software as a service (SaaS)

In the SaaS model, cloud providers install and operate application software in the cloud and cloud users access the software from cloud clients. Cloud users do not manage the cloud infrastructure and platform where the application runs. This eliminates the need to install and run the application on the cloud user's own computers, which simplifies maintenance and support. Cloud applications are different from other applications in their scalability—which can be achieved by cloning tasks onto multiple virtual machines at run-time to meet changing work demand.[49] Load balancers distribute the work over the set of virtual machines. This process is transparent to the cloud user, who sees only a single access point. To accommodate a large number of cloud users, cloud applications can be multitenant, that is, any machine serves more than one cloud user organization. It is common to refer to special types of cloud based application software with a similar naming convention: desktop as a service, business process as a service, test environment as a service, communication as a service.

The pricing model for SaaS applications is typically a monthly or yearly flat fee per user,[50] so price is scalable and adjustable if users are added or removed at any point.[51]

Examples of SaaS include: Google Apps, Microsoft Office 365, Onlive, GT Nexus, Marketo, and TradeCard.

Network as a service (NaaS)

A category of cloud services where the capability provided to the cloud service user is to use network/transport connectivity services and/or inter-cloud network connectivity services.[52] NaaS involves the optimization of resource allocations by considering network and computing resources as a unified whole.[53]

Traditional NaaS services include flexible and extended VPN, and bandwidth on demand.[52] NaaS concept materialization also includes the provision of a virtual network service by the owners of the network infrastructure to a third party (VNP – VNO).[54][55]

Cloud clients

Users access cloud computing using networked client devices, such as desktop computers, laptops, tablets and smartphones. Some of these devices - cloud clients - rely on cloud computing for all or a majority of their applications so as to be essentially useless without it. Examples are thin clients and the browser-based Chromebook. Many cloud applications do not require specific software on the client and instead use a web browser to interact with the cloud application. With Ajax and HTML5 these Web user interfaces can achieve a similar or even better look and feel as native applications. Some cloud applications, however, support specific client software dedicated to these applications (e.g., virtual desktop clients and most email clients). Some legacy applications (line of business applications that until now have been prevalent in thin client Windows computing) are delivered via a screen-sharing technology.

Deployment models

Cloud computing types

Public cloud

Public cloud applications, storage, and other resources are made available to the general public by a service provider. These services are free or offered on a pay-per-use model. Generally, public cloud service providers like Amazon AWS, Microsoft and Google own and operate the infrastructure and offer access only via Internet (direct connectivity is not offered).[27]

Community cloud

Community cloud shares infrastructure between several organizations from a specific community with common concerns (security, compliance, jurisdiction, etc.), whether managed internally or by a third-party and hosted internally or externally. The costs are spread over fewer users than a public cloud (but more than a private cloud), so only some of the cost savings potential of cloud computing are realized.[3]

Hybrid cloud

Hybrid cloud is a composition of two or more clouds (private, community or public) that remain unique entities but are bound together, offering the benefits of multiple deployment models.[3]

By utilizing "hybrid cloud" architecture, companies and individuals are able to obtain degrees of fault tolerance combined with locally immediate usability without dependency on internet connectivity. Hybrid cloud architecture requires both on-premises resources and off-site (remote) server-based cloud infrastructure.

Hybrid clouds lack the flexibility, security and certainty of in-house applications.[56] Hybrid cloud provides the flexibility of in house applications with the fault tolerance and scalability of cloud based services.

Private cloud

Private cloud is cloud infrastructure operated solely for a single organization, whether managed internally or by a third-party and hosted internally or externally.[3] Undertaking a private cloud project requires a significant level and degree of engagement to virtualize the business environment, and requires the organization to reevaluate decisions about existing resources. When done right, it can have improve business, but every step in the project raises security issues that must be addressed to prevent serious vulnerabilities.[57]

They have attracted criticism because users "still have to buy, build, and manage them" and thus do not benefit from less hands-on management,[58] essentially "[lacking] the economic model that makes cloud computing such an intriguing concept".[59][60]

Comparison for SaaS
Public cloudPrivate cloud
Initial costTypically zeroTypically high
Running costPredictibleUnpredictible
CustomizationImpossiblePossible
PrivacyNo (Host has access to the data)Yes
Single sign-onImpossiblePossible
Scaling upEasy while within defined limitsLaborious but no limits

Architecture

Cloud computing sample architecture

Cloud architecture,[61] the systems architecture of the software systems involved in the delivery of cloud computing, typically involves multiple cloud components communicating with each other over a loose coupling mechanism such as a messaging queue. Elastic provision implies intelligence in the use of tight or loose coupling as applied to mechanisms such as these and others.

The Intercloud

The Intercloud[62] is an interconnected global "cloud of clouds"[63][64] and an extension of the Internet "network of networks" on which it is based.[65][66][67]

Cloud engineering

Cloud engineering is the application of engineering disciplines to cloud computing. It brings a systematic approach to the high-level concerns of commercialisation, standardisation, and governance in conceiving, developing, operating and maintaining cloud computing systems. It is a multidisciplinary method encompassing contributions from diverse areas such as systems, software, web, performance, information, security, platform, risk, and quality engineering.

Issues

Privacy

Privacy advocates have criticized the cloud model for hosting companies' greater ease can control—and thus, can monitor at will—communication between host company and end user, and access user data (with or without permission). Instances such as the secret NSA program, working with AT&T, and Verizon, which recorded over 10 million telephone calls between American citizens, causes uncertainty among privacy advocates, and the greater powers it gives to telecommunication companies to monitor user activity.[68] Using a cloud service provider (CSP) can complicate data privacy because of the extent of virtualization (virtual machines) and cloud storage used to implement cloud service.[69] CSP operations, customer or tenant data may not remain on the same system, or in the same data center or even within the same provider's cloud; this can lead to legal concerns over jurisdiction. While there have been efforts (such as US-EU Safe Harbor) to "harmonise" the legal environment, providers such as Amazon still cater to major markets (typically the United States and the European Union) by deploying local infrastructure and allowing customers to select "availability zones."[70] Cloud computing poses privacy concerns because the service provider may access the data that is on the cloud at any point in time. They could accidentally or deliberately alter or even delete information.[71]

Postage and delivery services company Pitney Bowes launched Volly, a cloud-based, digital mailbox service to leverage its communication management assets. They also faced the technical challenge of providing strong data security and privacy. However, they were able to address the same concern by applying customized, application-level security, including encryption. [72]

Compliance

To comply with regulations including FISMA, HIPAA, and SOX in the United States, the Data Protection Directive in the EU and the credit card industry's PCI DSS, users may have to adopt community or hybrid deployment modes that are typically more expensive and may offer restricted benefits. This is how Google is able to "manage and meet additional government policy requirements beyond FISMA"[73][74] and Rackspace Cloud or QubeSpace are able to claim PCI compliance.[75]

Many providers also obtain a SAS 70 Type II audit, but this has been criticised on the grounds that the hand-picked set of goals and standards determined by the auditor and the auditee are often not disclosed and can vary widely.[76] Providers typically make this information available on request, under non-disclosure agreement.[77][78]

Customers in the EU contracting with cloud providers outside the EU/EEA have to adhere to the EU regulations on export of personal data.[79]

U.S. Federal Agencies have been directed by the Office of Management and Budget to use a process called FedRAMP (Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program) to assess and authorize cloud products and services. Federal CIO Steven VanRoekel issued a memorandum to federal agency Chief Information Officers on December 8, 2011 defining how federal agencies should use FedRAMP. FedRAMP consists of a subset of NIST Special Publication 800-53 security controls specifically selected to provide protection in cloud environments. A subset has been defined for the FIPS 199 low categorization and the FIPS 199 moderate categorization. The FedRAMP program has also established a Joint Accreditation Board (JAB) consisting of Chief Information Officers from DoD, DHS and GSA. The JAB is responsible for establishing accreditation standards for 3rd party organizations who perform the assessments of cloud solutions. The JAB also reviews authorization packages, and may grant provisional authorization (to operate). The federal agency consuming the service still has final responsibility for final authority to operate.[80]

Legal

As with other changes in the landscape of computing, certain legal issues arise with cloud computing, including trademark infringement, security concerns and sharing of proprietary data resources.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation has criticized the United States government for considering during the Megaupload seizure process that people lose property rights by storing data on a cloud computing service.[81]

One important but not often mentioned problem with cloud computing is the problem of who is in "possession" of the data. If a cloud company is the possessor of the data, the possessor has certain legal rights. If the cloud company is the "custodian" of the data, then a different set of rights would apply. The next problem in the legalities of cloud computing is the problem of legal ownership of the data. Many Terms of Service agreements are silent on the question of ownership.[82]

Open source

Open-source software has provided the foundation for many cloud computing implementations, prominent examples being the Hadoop framework[83] and VMware's Cloud Foundry.[84] In November 2007, the Free Software Foundation released the Affero General Public License, a version of GPLv3 intended to close a perceived legal loophole associated with free software designed to run over a network.[85]

Open standards

Most cloud providers expose APIs that are typically well-documented (often under a Creative Commons license[86]) but also unique to their implementation and thus not interoperable. Some vendors have adopted others' APIs and there are a number of open standards under development, with a view to delivering interoperability and portability.[87] As of November 2012, the Open Standard with broadest industry support is probably OpenStack, founded in 2010 by NASA and Rackspace, and now governed by the OpenStack Foundation.[88] OpenStack supporters include AMD, Intel, Canonical, SUSE Linux, Red Hat, Cisco, Dell, HP, IBM, Yahoo and now VMware.[89]

Security

As cloud computing is achieving increased popularity, concerns are being voiced about the security issues introduced through adoption of this new model. The effectiveness and efficiency of traditional protection mechanisms are being reconsidered as the characteristics of this innovative deployment model can differ widely from those of traditional architectures.[90] An alternative perspective on the topic of cloud security is that this is but another, although quite broad, case of "applied security" and that similar security principles that apply in shared multi-user mainframe security models apply with cloud security.[91]

The relative security of cloud computing services is a contentious issue that may be delaying its adoption.[92] Physical control of the Private Cloud equipment is more secure than having the equipment off site and under someone else’s control. Physical control and the ability to visually inspect data links and access ports is required in order to ensure data links are not compromised. Issues barring the adoption of cloud computing are due in large part to the private and public sectors' unease surrounding the external management of security-based services. It is the very nature of cloud computing-based services, private or public, that promote external management of provided services. This delivers great incentive to cloud computing service providers to prioritize building and maintaining strong management of secure services.[93] Security issues have been categorised into sensitive data access, data segregation, privacy, bug exploitation, recovery, accountability, malicious insiders, management console security, account control, and multi-tenancy issues. Solutions to various cloud security issues vary, from cryptography, particularly public key infrastructure (PKI), to use of multiple cloud providers, standardisation of APIs, and improving virtual machine support and legal support.[90][94][95]

Cloud computing offers many benefits, but is vulnerable to threats. As cloud computing uses increase, it is likely that more criminals find new ways to exploit system vulnerabilities. Many underlying challenges and risks in cloud computing increase the threat of data compromise. To mitigate the threat, cloud computing stakeholders should invest heavily in risk assessment to ensure that the system encrypts to protect data, establishes trusted foundation to secure the platform and infrastructure, and builds higher assurance into auditing to strengthen compliance. Security concerns must be addressed to maintain trust in cloud computing technology.[citation needed]

Sustainability

Although cloud computing is often assumed to be a form of green computing, no published study substantiates this assumption.[96] Citing the servers' effects on the environmental effects of cloud computing, in areas where climate favors natural cooling and renewable electricity is readily available, the environmental effects will be more moderate. (The same holds true for "traditional" data centers.) Thus countries with favorable conditions, such as Finland,[97] Sweden and Switzerland,[98] are trying to attract cloud computing data centers. Energy efficiency in cloud computing can result from energy-aware scheduling and server consolidation.[99] However, in the case of distributed clouds over data centers with different source of energies including renewable source of energies, a small compromise on energy consumption reduction could result in high carbon footprint reduction.[100]

Abuse

As with privately purchased hardware, customers can purchase the services of cloud computing for nefarious purposes. This includes password cracking and launching attacks using the purchased services.[101] In 2009, a banking trojan illegally used the popular Amazon service as a command and control channel that issued software updates and malicious instructions to PCs that were infected by the malware.[102]

IT governance

The introduction of cloud computing requires an appropriate IT governance model to ensure a secured computing environment and to comply with all relevant organizational information technology policies.[103][104] As such, organizations need a set of capabilities that are essential when effectively implementing and managing cloud services, including demand management, relationship management, data security management, application lifecycle management, risk and compliance management.[105] A danger lies with the explosion of companies joining the growth in cloud computing by becoming providers. However, many of the infrastructural and logistical concerns regarding the operation of cloud computing businesses are still unknown. This over-saturation may have ramifications for the industry as whole. [106]

Consumer end storage

The increased use of cloud computing could lead to a reduction in demand for high storage capacity consumer end devices, due to cheaper low storage devices that stream all content via the cloud becoming more popular.[citation needed] In a Wired article, Jake Gardner explains that while unregulated usage is beneficial for IT and tech moguls like Amazon, the anonymous nature of the cost of consumption of cloud usage makes it difficult for business to evaluate and incorporate it into their business plans. [106]

Ambiguity of terminology

Outside of the information technology and software industry, the term "cloud" can be found to reference a wide range of services, some of which fall under the category of cloud computing, while others do not. The cloud is often used to refer to a product or service that is discovered, accessed and paid for over the Internet, but is not necessarily a computing resource. Examples of service that are sometimes referred to as "the cloud" include, but are not limited to, crowd sourcing, cloud printing, crowd funding, cloud manufacturing. [107] [108]

Research

Many universities, vendors and government organizations are investing in research around the topic of cloud computing:[109][110]

  • In October 2007, the Academic Cloud Computing Initiative (ACCI) was announced as a multi-university project designed to enhance students' technical knowledge to address the challenges of cloud computing.[111]
  • In April 2009, UC Santa Barbara released the first open source platform-as-a-service, AppScale, which is capable of running Google App Engine applications at scale on a multitude of infrastructures.
  • In April 2009, the St Andrews Cloud Computing Co-laboratory was launched, focusing on research in the important new area of cloud computing. Unique in the UK, StACC aims to become an international centre of excellence for research and teaching in cloud computing and provides advice and information to businesses interested in cloud-based services.[112]
  • In October 2010, the TClouds (Trustworthy Clouds) project was started, funded by the European Commission's 7th Framework Programme. The project's goal is to research and inspect the legal foundation and architectural design to build a resilient and trustworthy cloud-of-cloud infrastructure on top of that. The project also develops a prototype to demonstrate its results.[113]
  • In December 2010, the TrustCloud research project [114][115] was started by HP Labs Singapore to address transparency and accountability of cloud computing via detective, data-centric approaches[116] encapsulated in a five-layer TrustCloud Framework. The team identified the need for monitoring data life cycles and transfers in the cloud,[114] leading to the tackling of key cloud computing security issues such as cloud data leakages, cloud accountability and cross-national data transfers in transnational clouds.
  • In July 2011, the High Performance Computing Cloud (HPCCLoud) project was kicked-off aiming at finding out the possibilities of enhancing performance on cloud environments while running the scientific applications - development of HPCCLoud Performance Analysis Toolkit which was funded by CIM-Returning Experts Programme - under the coordination of Prof. Dr. Shajulin Benedict.
  • In June 2011, the Telecommunications Industry Association developed a Cloud Computing White Paper, to analyze the integration challenges and opportunities between cloud services and traditional U.S. telecommunications standards.[117]

See also

References

  1. ^ "Baburajan, Rajani, "The Rising Cloud Storage Market Opportunity Strengthens Vendors," infoTECH, August 24, 2011". It.tmcnet.com. 2011-08-24. http://it.tmcnet.com/channels/cloud-s torage/articles/211183-rising-cloud-s torage-market-opportunity-strengthens -vendors.htm. Retrieved 2011-12-02.
  2. ^ "Oestreich, Ken, "Converged Infrastructure," CTO Forum, November 15, 2010". Thectoforum.com. 2010-11-15. http://www.thectoforum.com/content/co nverged-infrastructure-0. Retrieved 2011-12-02.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g "The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing". National Institute of Standards and Technology. http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nis tpubs/800-145/SP800-145.pdf. Retrieved 24 July 2011.
  4. ^ Figure 8, "A network […] is shown schematically as a cloud", U.S. Patent 5,485,455, column 17, line 22, filed Jan 28, 1994
  5. ^ Figure 1, "the cloud indicated at 49 in Fig. 1.", U.S. Patent 5,790,548, column 5 lines 56-57, filed April 18, 1996
  6. ^ Strachey, Christopher (June 1959). "Time Sharing in Large Fast Computers". Proceedings of the International Conference on Information processing, UNESCO. paper B.2.19: 336–341.
  7. ^ "July, 1993 meeting report from the IP over ATM working group of the IETF". CH: Switch. http://mirror.switch.ch/ftp/doc/ietf/ ipatm/atm-minutes-93jul.txt. Retrieved 2010-08-22.
  8. ^ Corbató, Fernando J.. "An Experimental Time-Sharing System". SJCC Proceedings. MIT. http://larch-www.lcs.mit.edu:8001/~co rbato/sjcc62/. Retrieved 3 July 2012.
  9. ^ Ryan; Falvey; Merchant (October 2011). "Regulation of the Cloud in India". Journal of Internet Law 15 (4). http://ssrn.com/abstract=1941494
  10. ^ Andreas Tolk. 2006. What Comes After the Semantic Web - PADS Implications for the Dynamic Web. 20th Workshop on Principles of Advanced and Distributed Simulation (PADS '06). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA
  11. ^ "Cloud Computing: Clash of the clouds". The Economist. 2009-10-15. http://www.economist.com/displaystory .cfm?story_id=14637206. Retrieved 2009-11-03.
  12. ^ "Gartner Says Cloud Computing Will Be As Influential As E-business". Gartner. http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id =707508. Retrieved 2010-08-22.
  13. ^ Gruman, Galen (2008-04-07). "What cloud computing really means". InfoWorld. http://www.infoworld.com/d/cloud-comp uting/what-cloud-computing-really-mea ns-031. Retrieved 2009-06-02.
  14. ^ a b "Jeff Bezos' Risky Bet". Business Week. http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/ content/06_46/b4009001.htm
  15. ^ "Amazon’s early efforts at cloud computing partly accidental". IT Knowledge Exchange. Tech Target. 2010‐6‐17. http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget .com/cloud-computing/2010/06/17/amazo ns-early-efforts-at-cloud-computing-p artly-accidental/
  16. ^ B Rochwerger, J Caceres, RS Montero, D Breitgand, E Elmroth, A Galis, E Levy, IM Llorente, K Nagin, Y Wolfsthal, E Elmroth, J Caceres, M Ben-Yehuda, W Emmerich, F Galan. "The RESERVOIR Model and Architecture for Open Federated Cloud Computing", IBM Journal of Research and Development, Vol. 53, No. 4. (2009)
  17. ^ D Kyriazis, A Menychtas, G Kousiouris, K Oberle, T Voith, M Boniface, E Oliveros, T Cucinotta, S Berger, “A Real-time Service Oriented Infrastructure”, International Conference on Real-Time and Embedded Systems (RTES 2010), Singapore, November 2010
  18. ^ Keep an eye on cloud computing, Amy Schurr, Network World, 2008-07-08, citing the Gartner report, "Cloud Computing Confusion Leads to Opportunity". Retrieved 2009-09-11.
  19. ^ Gartner Says Worldwide IT Spending On Pace to Surpass Trillion in 2008, Gartner, 2008-08-18. Retrieved 2009-09-11.
  20. ^ "Launch of IBM Smarter Computing". https://www-304.ibm.com/connections/b logs/IBMSmarterSystems/date/201102?la ng=en_us. Retrieved 1 March 2011.
  21. ^ "What's In A Name? Utility vs. Cloud vs Grid". Datacenterknowledge.com. http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/ar chives/2008/Mar/25/whats_in_a_name_ut ility_vs_cloud_vs_grid.html. Retrieved 2010-08-22.
  22. ^ "Distributed Application Architecture". Sun Microsystem. http://java.sun.com/developer/Books/j dbc/ch07.pdf. Retrieved 2009-06-16.
  23. ^ "Sun CTO: Cloud computing is like the mainframe". Itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com. 2009-03-11. http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget .com/mainframe-blog/sun-cto-cloud-com puting-is-like-the-mainframe/. Retrieved 2010-08-22.
  24. ^ "It's probable that you've misunderstood 'Cloud Computing' until now". TechPluto. http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id =1496091.1496100&coll=&dl=ACM &CFID=21518680&CFTOKEN=188008 07. Retrieved 2010-09-14.
  25. ^ Danielson, Krissi (2008-03-26). "Distinguishing Cloud Computing from Utility Computing". Ebizq.net. http://www.ebizq.net/blogs/saasweek/2 008/03/distinguishing_cloud_computing /. Retrieved 2010-08-22.
  26. ^ "Recession Is Good For Cloud Computing – Microsoft Agrees". CloudAve. http://www.cloudave.com/link/recessio n-is-good-for-cloud-computing-microso ft-agrees. Retrieved 2010-08-22.
  27. ^ a b c d "Defining "Cloud Services" and "Cloud Computing"". IDC. 2008-09-23. http://blogs.idc.com/ie/?p=190. Retrieved 2010-08-22.
  28. ^ "e-FISCAL project state of the art repository". http://www.efiscal.eu/state-of-the-ar t.
  29. ^ Farber, Dan (2008-06-25). "The new geek chic: Data centers". CNET News. http://news.cnet.com/8301-13953_3-997 7049-80.html. Retrieved 2010-08-22.
  30. ^ King, Rachael (2008-08-04). "Cloud Computing: Small Companies Take Flight". Businessweek. http://www.businessweek.com/technolog y/content/aug2008/tc2008083_619516.ht m. Retrieved 2010-08-22.
  31. ^ Mao, Ming; M. Humphrey (2012). "A Performance Study on the VM Startup Time in the Cloud". Proceedings of 2012 IEEE 5th International Conference on Cloud Computing (Cloud2012): 423. doi:10.1109/CLOUD.2012.103. ISBN 978-1-4673-2892-0. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stam p.jsp?tp=&arnumber=6253534&is number=6253471.
  32. ^ "Defining and Measuring Cloud Elasticity". KIT Software Quality Departement. http://digbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de/v olltexte/1000023476. Retrieved 13 August 2011.
  33. ^ "Economies of Cloud Scale Infrastructure". Cloud Slam 2011. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfDsY3 f4nVI. Retrieved 13 May 2011.
  34. ^ "Encrypted Storage and Key Management for the cloud". Cryptoclarity.com. 2009-07-30. http://www.cryptoclarity.com/CryptoCl arityLLC/Welcome/Entries/2009/7/23_En crypted_Storage_and_Key_Management_fo r_the_cloud.html. Retrieved 2010-08-22.
  35. ^ Mills, Elinor (2009-01-27). "Cloud computing security forecast: Clear skies". CNET News. http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-1015 0569-83.html. Retrieved 2010-08-22.
  36. ^ David Perera (2012-07-12). "The real obstacle to federal cloud computing". FierceGovernmentIT. http://www.fiercegovernmentit.com/sto ry/real-obstacle-federal-cloud-comput ing/2012-07-12. Retrieved 2012-12-15.
  37. ^ "Top 10 Reasons why Startups should Consider Cloud". Cloudstory.in. 2012-09-05. http://cloudstory.in/2012/07/top-10-r easons-why-startups-should-consider-c loud/. Retrieved 2012-12-15.
  38. ^ "BMC Service Catalog Enforces Workload Location". eweek.com. 2011-08-02. http://www.eweek.com/reviews/bmc-serv ice-catalog-enforces-workload-locatio n. Retrieved 2013-03-10.
  39. ^ "HP's Turn-Key Private Cloud - Application Development Trends". Adtmag.com. 2010-08-30. http://adtmag.com/blogs/watersworks/2 010/08/hps-turn-key-private-cloud.asp x. Retrieved 2012-12-15.
  40. ^ a b c Babcock, Charles (2011-06-03). "RightScale Launches App Store For Infrastructure - Cloud-computing". Informationweek.com. http://www.informationweek.com/news/c loud-computing/infrastructure/2299001 65. Retrieved 2012-12-15.
  41. ^ a b "Red Hat launches hybrid cloud management software - Open Source". Techworld. 2012-06-06. http://www.techworld.com.au/article/4 26861/red_hat_launches_hybrid_cloud_m anagement_software. Retrieved 2012-12-15.
  42. ^ Brown, Rodney (April 10, 2012). "Spinning up the instant cloud". CloudEcosystem. http://www.cloudecosystem.com/author. asp?section_id=1873&doc_id=242031.
  43. ^ Riglian, Adam (December 1, 2011). "VIP Art Fair picks OpDemand over RightScale for IaaS management". Search Cloud Applications. TechTarget. http://searchcloudapplications.techta rget.com/news/2240111861/VIP-Art-Fair -picks-OpDemand-over-RightScale-for-I aaS-management. Retrieved January 25, 2013.
  44. ^ Samson, Ted (April 10, 2012). "HP advances public cloud as part of ambitious hybrid cloud strategy". InfoWorld. http://www.infoworld.com/t/hybrid-clo ud/hp-advances-public-cloud-part-of-a mbitious-hybrid-cloud-strategy-190524. Retrieved 2012-12-14.
  45. ^ "HP Cloud Maps can ease application automation". SiliconIndia. http://www.siliconindia.com/shownews/ HP_Cloud_Maps_can_Ease_Application_Au tomation-nid-103866-cid-7.html. Retrieved 22 January 2013.
  46. ^ Voorsluys, William; Broberg, James; Buyya, Rajkumar (February 2011). "Introduction to Cloud Computing". In R. Buyya, J. Broberg, A.Goscinski. Cloud Computing: Principles and Paradigms. New York, USA: Wiley Press. pp. 1–44. ISBN 978-0-470-88799-8. http://media.johnwiley.com.au/product _data/excerpt/90/04708879/0470887990- 180.pdf.
  47. ^ "ITU-T NEWSLOG - CLOUD COMPUTING AND STANDARDIZATION: TECHNICAL REPORTS PUBLISHED". International Telecommunication Union (ITU). http://www.itu.int/ITU-T/newslog/Clou d+Computing+And+Standardization+Techn ical+Reports+Published.aspx. Retrieved 16 December 2012.
  48. ^ Amies, Alex; Sluiman, Harm; Tong, Qiang Guo; Liu, Guo Ning (July 2012). "Infrastructure as a Service Cloud Concepts". Developing and Hosting Applications on the Cloud. IBM Press. ISBN 978-0-13-306684-5. http://www.ibmpressbooks.com/bookstor e/product.asp?isbn=9780133066845.
  49. ^ Hamdaqa, Mohammad. A Reference Model for Developing Cloud Applications. http://www.stargroup.uwaterloo.ca/~mh amdaqa/publications/A%20REFERENCEMODE LFORDEVELOPINGCLOUD%20APPLICATIONS.pd f.
  50. ^ Chou, Timothy. Introduction to Cloud Computing: Business & Technology. http://www.scribd.com/doc/64699897/In troduction-to-Cloud-Computing-Busines s-and-Technology.
  51. ^ "HVD: the cloud's silver lining". Intrinsic Technology. http://www.intrinsictechnology.co.uk/ FileUploads/HVD_Whitepaper.pdf. Retrieved 30 August 2012.
  52. ^ a b "ITU Focus Group on Cloud Computing - Part 1". International Telecommunication Union (ITU) TELECOMMUNICATION STANDARDIZATION SECTOR OF ITU. http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/focusgrou ps/cloud/Documents/FG-coud-technical- report.zip. Retrieved 16 December 2012.
  53. ^ "Cloud computing in Telecommunications". Ericsson. http://www.ericsson.com/res/thecompan y/docs/publications/ericsson_review/2 010/cloudcomputing.pdf. Retrieved 16 December 2012.
  54. ^ "Network Virtualisation – Opportunities and Challenges". Eurescom. http://archive.eurescom.eu/~pub/deliv erables/documents/P1900-series/P1956/ D1/P1956-D1.pdf. Retrieved 16 December 2012.
  55. ^ "The role of virtualisation in future network architectures". Change Project. http://www.change-project.eu/fileadmi n/publications/Presentations/CHANGE_- _The_role_of_virtualisation_in_future _network_infrastructures_-_Warsaw_clu ster_workshop_contribution.pdf. Retrieved 16 December 2012.
  56. ^ Stevens, Alan (June 29, 2011). "When hybrid clouds are a mixed blessing". The Register. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/06/ 29/hybrid_cloud/. Retrieved March 28, 2012.
  57. ^ "Is a Private Cloud Really More Secure?". Dell.com. http://www.dell.com/Learn/us/en/rc956 904/large-business/private-cloud-more -secure. Retrieved 07-11-12.[dead link]
  58. ^ Foley, John. "Private Clouds Take Shape". InformationWeek. http://www.informationweek.com/news/s ervices/business/showArticle.jhtml?ar ticleID=209904474. Retrieved 2010-08-22.
  59. ^ Haff, Gordon (2009-01-27). "Just don't call them private clouds". CNET News. http://news.cnet.com/8301-13556_3-101 50841-61.html. Retrieved 2010-08-22.
  60. ^ "There's No Such Thing As A Private Cloud". InformationWeek. 2010-06-30. http://www.informationweek.com/cloud- computing/theres-no-such-thing-as-a-p rivate-cloud/229207922. Retrieved 2010-08-22.
  61. ^ "Building GrepTheWeb in the Cloud, Part 1: Cloud Architectures". Developer.amazonwebservices.com. http://developer.amazonwebservices.co m/connect/entry.jspa?externalID=1632& amp;categoryID=100. Retrieved 2010-08-22.
  62. ^ Bernstein, David; Ludvigson, Erik; Sankar, Krishna; Diamond, Steve; Morrow, Monique (2009-05-24). "Blueprint for the Intercloud - Protocols and Formats for Cloud Computing Interoperability". Blueprint for the Intercloud – Protocols and Formats for Cloud Computing Interoperability. IEEE Computer Society. pp. 328–336. doi:10.1109/ICIW.2009.55. ISBN 978-1-4244-3851-8. http://www2.computer.org/portal/web/c sdl/doi/10.1109/ICIW.2009.55.
  63. ^ "Kevin Kelly: A Cloudbook for the Cloud". Kk.org. http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archive s/2007/11/a_cloudbook_for.php. Retrieved 2010-08-22.
  64. ^ "Intercloud is a global cloud of clouds". Samj.net. 2009-06-22. http://samj.net/2009/06/intercloud-is -global-cloud-of-clouds.html. Retrieved 2010-08-22.
  65. ^ "Vint Cerf: Despite Its Age, The Internet is Still Filled with Problems". Readwriteweb.com. http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ vint_cerf_despite_its_age_the.php?mtc Campaign=2765. Retrieved 2010-08-22.
  66. ^ "SP360: Service Provider: From India to Intercloud". Blogs.cisco.com. http://blogs.cisco.com/sp/comments/fr om_india_to_intercloud/. Retrieved 2010-08-22.
  67. ^ Canada (2007-11-29). "Head in the clouds? Welcome to the future". Toronto: Theglobeandmail.com. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servle t/story/LAC.20071129.TWLINKS29/TPStor y/Business. Retrieved 2010-08-22.
  68. ^ Cauley, Leslie (2006-05-11). "NSA has massive database of Americans' phone calls". USATODAY.com. http://www.usatoday.com/news/washingt on/2006-05-10-nsa_x.htm. Retrieved 2010-08-22.
  69. ^ Winkler, Vic (2011). Securing the Cloud: Cloud Computer Security Techniques and Tactics. Waltham, Massachusetts: Elsevier. p. 60. ISBN 978-1-59749-592-9. http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/book description.cws_home/723529/descripti on.
  70. ^ "Feature Guide: Amazon EC2 Availability Zones". Amazon Web Services. http://developer.amazonwebservices.co m/connect/entry.jspa?externalID=1347& amp;categoryID=112. Retrieved 2010-08-22.
  71. ^ "Cloud Computing Privacy Concerns on Our Doorstep". http://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2011/1/ 103200-cloud-computing-privacy-concer ns-on-our-doorstep/fulltext.
  72. ^ "Cloud Enables New Business Opportunity". http://smartenterpriseexchange.com/co mmunity/execution/blog/2011/06/13/clo ud-enables-new-business-opportunity/f ulltext.
  73. ^ "FISMA compliance for federal cloud computing on the horizon in 2010". SearchCompliance.com. http://searchcompliance.techtarget.co m/news/article/0,289142,sid195_gci137 7298,00.html. Retrieved 2010-08-22.
  74. ^ "Google Apps and Government". Official Google Enterprise Blog. 2009-09-15. http://googleenterprise.blogspot.com/ 2009/09/google-apps-and-government.ht ml. Retrieved 2010-08-22.
  75. ^ "Cloud Hosting is Secure for Take-off: Mosso Enables The Spreadsheet Store, an Online Merchant, to become PCI Compliant". Rackspace. 2009-03-14. http://www.rackspace.com/cloud/blog/2 009/03/05/cloud-hosting-is-secure-for -take-off-mosso-enables-the-spreadshe et-store-an-online-merchant-to-become -pci-compliant/. Retrieved 2010-08-22.
  76. ^ "Amazon gets SAS 70 Type II audit stamp, but analysts not satisfied". SearchCloudComputing.com. 2009-11-17. http://searchcloudcomputing.techtarge t.com/news/article/0,289142,sid201_gc i1374629,00.html. Retrieved 2010-08-22.
  77. ^ "Assessing Cloud Computing Agreements and Controls". WTN News. http://wistechnology.com/articles/695 4/. Retrieved 2010-08-22.
  78. ^ "Cloud Certification From Compliance Mandate to Competitive Differentiator". Cloudcor. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYiFdn ZAlNQ. Retrieved 2011-09-20.
  79. ^ "How the New EU Rules on Data Export Affect Companies in and Outside the EU | Dr. Thomas Helbing – Kanzlei für Datenschutz-, Online- und IT-Recht". Dr. Thomas Helbing. http://www.thomashelbing.com/en/how-n ew-eu-rules-data-export-affect-compan ies-and-outside-eu. Retrieved 2010-08-22.
  80. ^ "FedRAMP". U.S. General Services Administration. 2012-06-13. http://www.gsa.gov/portal/category/10 2371. Retrieved 2012-06-17.
  81. ^ Cohn, Cindy; Samuels, Julie (31 October 2012). "Megaupload and the Government's Attack on Cloud Computing"]. Electronic Frontier Foundation. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/10 /governments-attack-cloud-computing. Retrieved 2012-12-14.
  82. ^ Maltais, Michelle (26 April 2012). "Who owns your stuff in the cloud?". Los Angeles Times. http://articles.latimes.com/2012/apr/ 26/business/la-fi-tech-savvy-cloud-se rvices-20120426. Retrieved 2012-12-14.
  83. ^ Jon Brodkin (July 28, 2008). "Open source fuels growth of cloud computing, software-as-a-service". Network World. http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008 /072808-open-source-cloud-computing.h tml. Retrieved 2012-12-14.
  84. ^ "VMware Launches Open Source PaaS Cloud Foundry". Simpler Media Group, Inc.. 2011-04-21. http://www.cmswire.com/cms/informatio n-management/vmware-launches-open-sou rce-paas-cloud-foundry-010941.php. Retrieved 2012-12-14.
  85. ^ "AGPL: Open Source Licensing in a Networked Age". Redmonk.com. 2009-04-15. http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2009/04/15 /open-source-licensing-in-a-networked -age/. Retrieved 2010-08-22.
  86. ^ GoGrid Moves API Specification to Creative Commons[dead link]
  87. ^ "Eucalyptus Completes Amazon Web Services Specs with Latest Release". Ostatic.com. http://ostatic.com/blog/eucalyptus-co mpletes-amazon-web-services-specs-wit h-latest-release. Retrieved 2010-08-22.
  88. ^ "OpenStack Foundation launches". Infoworld.com. 2012-09-19. http://www.infoworld.com/d/cloud-comp uting/openstack-foundation-launches-2 02694/. Retrieved 2012-17-11.
  89. ^ "Did OpenStack Let VMware Into The Henhouse?". Informationweek.com. 2012-10-19. http://www.informationweek.com/develo pment/open-source/did-openstack-let-v mware-into-the-henhou/240009337. Retrieved 2012-17-11.
  90. ^ a b Zissis, Dimitrios; Lekkas (2010). "Addressing cloud computing security issues". Future Generation Computer Systems 28 (3): 583. doi:10.1016/j.future.2010.12.006. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0167739X10002554.
  91. ^ Winkler, Vic (2011). Securing the Cloud: Cloud Computer Security Techniques and Tactics. Waltham, MA USA: Syngress. pp. 187, 189. ISBN 978-1-59749-592-9. http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/book description.cws_home/723529/descripti on#description.
  92. ^ "Are security issues delaying adoption of cloud computing?". Network World. http://www.networkworld.com/news/2009 /042709-burning-security-cloud-comput ing.html. Retrieved 2010-08-22.
  93. ^ "Security of virtualization, cloud computing divides IT and security pros". Network World. 2010-02-22. http://www.networkworld.com/news/2010 /022210-virtualization-cloud-security -debate.html. Retrieved 2010-08-22.
  94. ^ Armbrust, M; Fox, A., Griffith, R., Joseph, A., Katz, R., Konwinski, A., Lee, G., Patterson, D., Rabkin, A., Zaharia, (2010). "A view of cloud computing". Communication of the ACM 53 (4): 50–58. doi:10.1145/1721654.1721672.
  95. ^ Anthens, G (2010). "Security in the cloud". Communications of the ACM 53 (11): 16. doi:10.1145/1839676.1839683.
  96. ^ James Urquhart (January 7, 2010). "Cloud computing's green paradox". CNET News. http://news.cnet.com/8301-19413_3-104 28065-240.html. Retrieved March 12, 2010. "...there is some significant evidence that the cloud is encouraging more compute consumption"
  97. ^ Finland – First Choice for Siting Your Cloud Computing Data Center.. Retrieved 4 August 2010.
  98. ^ Swiss Carbon-Neutral Servers Hit the Cloud.. Retrieved 4 August 2010.
  99. ^ Berl, Andreas, et al., Energy-Efficient Cloud Computing, The Computer Journal, 2010.
  100. ^ Farrahi Moghaddam, Fereydoun, et al., Low Carbon Virtual Private Clouds, IEEE Cloud 2011.
  101. ^ Alpeyev, Pavel (2011-05-14). "Amazon.com Server Said to Have Been Used in Sony Attack". Bloomberg. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-05 -13/sony-network-said-to-have-been-in vaded-by-hackers-using-amazon-com-ser ver.html. Retrieved 2011-08-20.
  102. ^ Goodin, Dan (2011-05-14). "PlayStation Network hack launched from Amazon EC2". The Register. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/05/ 14/playstation_network_attack_from_am azon/. Retrieved 2012-05-18.
  103. ^ Hsu, Wen-Hsi L., “Conceptual Framework of Cloud Computing Governance Model - An Education Perspective”, IEEE Technology and Engineering Education (ITEE), Vol 7, No 2 (2012) [1]
  104. ^ Stackpole, Beth, “Governance Meets Cloud: Top Misconceptions”, InformationWeek, 7 May 2012 [2]
  105. ^ Joha, A and M. Janssen (2012) “Transformation to Cloud Services Sourcing: Required IT Governance Capabilities”, ICST Transactions on e-Business 12(7-9) [3]
  106. ^ a b Beware: 7 Sins of Cloud Computing
  107. ^ S. Stonham and S. Nahalkova (2012) “What is the Cloud and how can it help my business?" [4]
  108. ^ S. Stonham and S. Nahalkova (2012), Whitepaper “Tomorrow Belongs to the Agile (PDF)" [5]
  109. ^ "Cloud Net Directory. Retrieved 2010-03-01". Cloudbook.net. http://www.cloudbook.net/directories/ research-clouds. Retrieved 2010-08-22.
  110. ^ "– National Science Foundation (NSF) News – National Science Foundation Awards Millions to Fourteen Universities for Cloud Computing Research – US National Science Foun". Nsf.gov. http://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp ?cntn_id=114686. Retrieved 2011-08-20.
  111. ^ Rich Miller (2008-05-02). "IBM, Google Team on an Enterprise Cloud". DataCenterKnowledge.com. http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/ar chives/2008/05/02/ibm-google-team-on- an-enterprise-cloud/. Retrieved 2010-08-22.
  112. ^ "StACC - Collaborative Research in Cloud Computing". University of St Andrews department of Computer Science. http://www.cs.st-andrews.ac.uk/stacc. Retrieved 2012-06-17.
  113. ^ "Trustworthy Clouds: Privacy and Resilience for Internet-scale Critical Infrastructure". http://www.tclouds-project.eu. Retrieved 2012-06-17.
  114. ^ a b Ko, Ryan K. L.; Jagadpramana, Peter; Lee, Bu Sung (2011). "Flogger: A File-centric Logger for Monitoring File Access and Transfers within Cloud Computing Environments". Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy of Computing and Communications (TrustCom-11): 765. doi:10.1109/TrustCom.2011.100. ISBN 978-1-4577-2135-9. http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/201 1/HPL-2011-119.pdf.
  115. ^ Ko, Ryan K. L.; Jagadpramana, Peter; Mowbray, Miranda; Pearson, Siani; Kirchberg, Markus; Liang, Qianhui; Lee, Bu Sung (2011). "TrustCloud: A Framework for Accountability and Trust in Cloud Computing". Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE Cloud Forum for Practitioners (IEEE ICFP 2011), Washington DC, USA, July 7–8, 2011. http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/201 1/HPL-2011-38.pdf.
  116. ^ Ko, Ryan K. L. Ko; Kirchberg, Markus; Lee, Bu Sung (2011). "From System-Centric Logging to Data-Centric Logging - Accountability, Trust and Security in Cloud Computing". Proceedings of the 1st Defence, Science and Research Conference 2011 - Symposium on Cyber Terrorism, IEEE Computer Society, 3–4 August 2011, Singapore. http://www.hpl.hp.com/people/ryan_ko/ RKo-DSR2011-Data_Centric_Logging.pdf.
  117. ^ "Publication Download". Tiaonline.org. http://www.tiaonline.org/market_intel ligence/publication_download.cfm?file =TIA_Cloud_Computing_White_Paper. Retrieved 2011-12-02.

External links

(Sebelumnya) Cloud collaborationCloud.bg (Berikutnya)